Smith v. Segal
Smith v. Segal
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Fellicia Smith, Civ. No. 22-2872 (JWB/TNL) Petitioner, v. ORDER Michael Segal, Warden FCI-Waseca; Deanna Hiller, C/D/Unit Manager; and Kayla Brosch, Case Manager, Respondents.
The above matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated March 15, 2023. (Doc.
No. 7.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The March 15, 2023 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 5, 2023 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell_______ JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Fellicia Smith, Civ. No. 22-2872 (JWB/TNL) Petitioner, v. ORDER Michael Segal, Warden FCI-Waseca; Deanna Hiller, C/D/Unit Manager; and Kayla Brosch, Case Manager, Respondents.
The above matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated March 15, 2023. (Doc.
No. 7.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The March 15, 2023 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 5, 2023 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell_______ JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.