Maombi v. Department Of Homeland Security, The
Maombi v. Department Of Homeland Security, The
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Alex Maombi, Civ. No. 23-341 (JWB/DTS) Petitioner, v. ORDER The Department of Homeland Security, and ICE, Respondents.
The above matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated March 14, 2023. (Doc. No. 3.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The March 14, 2023 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 3, 2023 _s/ Jerry W. Blackwell_______ JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Alex Maombi, Civ. No. 23-341 (JWB/DTS) Petitioner, v. ORDER The Department of Homeland Security, and ICE, Respondents.
The above matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated March 14, 2023. (Doc. No. 3.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The March 14, 2023 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 3, 2023 _s/ Jerry W. Blackwell_______ JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.