Adams v. Thompson
Adams v. Thompson
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oscar Lee Adams, Case No. 22-cv-3047 (WMW/JFD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Mark Thompson, Kathleen A. Loomis, the County of Hennepin, and Hennepin County District Court Administrator Office, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the July 5, 2023 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. 39.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The July 5, 2023 R&R, (Dkt. 39), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Hennepin County’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 12), is GRANTED in that Mr. Adams’ § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Mr. Adams’ state-law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Defendants Hennepin County Court Administrator Office, Kathleen A.
Loomis, and Mark Thompson’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 19), is GRANTED in that Mr. Adams’ § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Mr. Adams’ state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 25th, 2023 s / W i l h e l m i n a M . W r i g h t Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oscar Lee Adams, Case No. 22-cv-3047 (WMW/JFD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION Mark Thompson, Kathleen A. Loomis, the County of Hennepin, and Hennepin County District Court Administrator Office, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the July 5, 2023 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. 39.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The July 5, 2023 R&R, (Dkt. 39), is ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Hennepin County’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 12), is GRANTED in that Mr. Adams’ § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Mr. Adams’ state-law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Defendants Hennepin County Court Administrator Office, Kathleen A.
Loomis, and Mark Thompson’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. 19), is GRANTED in that Mr. Adams’ § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Mr. Adams’ state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: July 25th, 2023 s / W i l h e l m i n a M . W r i g h t Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.