Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2023

Jorgensen v. Eischen

Jorgensen v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided August 25, 2023

Jorgensen v. Eischen

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Dwight Chris Jorgensen, Case No. 22-CV-1383 (KMM/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen, Respondent.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty dated May 25, 2023. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Jorgensen’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Dkt. No. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice because it is not yet ripe.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: August 25, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Dwight Chris Jorgensen, Case No. 22-CV-1383 (KMM/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen, Respondent.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty dated May 25, 2023. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Jorgensen’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Dkt. No. 1] is DISMISSED without prejudice because it is not yet ripe.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: August 25, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑