Braunschweig v. Kijakazi
Braunschweig v. Kijakazi
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Shari Braunschweig, Case No. 22-cv-1539 (DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Kilolo Kijakazi, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees (“Motion”) (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff seeks attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,346.50 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“EAJA”) (see ECF Nos. 22–23). The Government does not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion or the amount requested (see ECF No. 24). Based on the parties’ agreement, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and directs the Government to pay $3,346.50 to Plaintiff. In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the EAJA fees may be subject to offset or satisfy any preexisting debit that Plaintiff may owe the United States.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2023 s/ Dulce J. Foster Dulce J. Foster United States Magistrate Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Shari Braunschweig, Case No. 22-cv-1539 (DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Kilolo Kijakazi, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys Fees (“Motion”) (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff seeks attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,346.50 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (“EAJA”) (see ECF Nos. 22–23). The Government does not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion or the amount requested (see ECF No. 24). Based on the parties’ agreement, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and directs the Government to pay $3,346.50 to Plaintiff. In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the EAJA fees may be subject to offset or satisfy any preexisting debit that Plaintiff may owe the United States.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2023 s/ Dulce J. Foster Dulce J. Foster United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.