Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2023

Boykin v. Pugh

Boykin v. Pugh
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided November 8, 2023

Boykin v. Pugh

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Cleveland Alan Boykin, Case No. 23-CV-153 (KMM/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Jessie Pugh, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, dated August 23, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Petitioner William Cleveland Alan Boykin (ECF 1) is DENIED.

2. No Certificate of Appealability is issued.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: November 8, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Cleveland Alan Boykin, Case No. 23-CV-153 (KMM/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Jessie Pugh, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, dated August 23, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Petitioner William Cleveland Alan Boykin (ECF 1) is DENIED.

2. No Certificate of Appealability is issued.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: November 8, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑