U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2023

Steingraber v. Kijakazi

Steingraber v. Kijakazi
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided November 28, 2023

Steingraber v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jill S., File No. 22-cv-2168 (ECT/DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation on November 2, 2023. ECF No. 21. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s request for relief [ECF No. 17] is DENIED; 3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 19] is GRANTED; 4. The Commissioner’s Decision is AFFIRMED; and 5. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: November 28, 2023 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jill S., File No. 22-cv-2168 (ECT/DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation on November 2, 2023. ECF No. 21. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s request for relief [ECF No. 17] is DENIED; 3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 19] is GRANTED; 4. The Commissioner’s Decision is AFFIRMED; and 5. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: November 28, 2023 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.