MacDermott v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
MacDermott v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Troy Nicholas MacDermott, Case No. 24-CV-01984 (JMB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
AMENDED ORDER ON REPORT
v.
AND
RECOMMENDATION
Federal Bureau of Prisons, BOP, Collette
S. Peters, Director, BOP, in her official
capacity,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated June 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 11.)
Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn.
L.R. 72.2(b)(1). In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear
error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996)
(per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings
in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 11) is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class, (Doc. No. 4), is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE as premature; and
3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Class Counsel, (Doc. No. 6), is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature.
Dated: July 19, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Troy Nicholas MacDermott, Case No. 24-CV-01984 (JMB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
AMENDED ORDER ON REPORT
v.
AND
RECOMMENDATION
Federal Bureau of Prisons, BOP, Collette
S. Peters, Director, BOP, in her official
capacity,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated June 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 11.)
Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn.
L.R. 72.2(b)(1). In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear
error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996)
(per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings
in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 11) is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class, (Doc. No. 4), is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE as premature; and
3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Class Counsel, (Doc. No. 6), is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature.
Dated: July 19, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown