Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Steven Goldmann et al.,
Case No. 21-cv-2530 (KMM/DJF)
Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER
The County of Sherburne, et al.,
Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster, dated May
31, 2024. ECF 151. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the permitted time
period.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections
are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County,563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the
record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF 151] is ACCEPTED.
2. The class action claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and
STRICKEN from the Amended Complaint [ECF 67], including paragraphs 33,
48-60, and 137(A), as well as the characterization of this case as a class action in
the caption and paragraphs 1 and 2.
Date: July 15, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Steven Goldmann et al.,
Case No. 21-cv-2530 (KMM/DJF)
Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER
The County of Sherburne, et al.,
Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster, dated May
31, 2024. ECF 151. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the permitted time
period.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections
are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County,563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the
record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF 151] is ACCEPTED.
2. The class action claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and
STRICKEN from the Amended Complaint [ECF 67], including paragraphs 33,
48-60, and 137(A), as well as the characterization of this case as a class action in
the caption and paragraphs 1 and 2.
Date: July 15, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown