Lindsey v. Department of Human Services
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dale Allen Lindsey, Case No. 23-CV-3299 (KMM/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Jodi Harpstead, Nicole Broder, John Barry, Keire Ovsak, Tanya Eiffer, and Krista Gilpin, Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated July 12, 2024. ECF 40. Judge Docherty recommends the dismissal of official-capacity claims against certain state officials, but would allow certain individual-capacity claims to proceed. See id. Plaintiff Dale Lindsey has filed a response indicating he does not object to these recommendations. ECF 42.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 21) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Causes of Action for monetary damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants sued in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Date: August 20, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Dale Allen Lindsey, Case No. 23-CV-3299 (KMM/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Jodi Harpstead, Nicole Broder, John Barry, Keire Ovsak, Tanya Eiffer, and Krista Gilpin, Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated July 12, 2024. ECF 40. Judge Docherty recommends the dismissal of official-capacity claims against certain state officials, but would allow certain individual-capacity claims to proceed. See id. Plaintiff Dale Lindsey has filed a response indicating he does not object to these recommendations. ECF 42.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 21) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Causes of Action for monetary damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants sued in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Date: August 20, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.