Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst

Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided August 21, 2024

Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Enahi Beiza-Denova, Case No. 24-CV-1718 (KMM/DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Thomas Hollenhorst, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Dulce J. Foster, dated June 27, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: August 20, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Enahi Beiza-Denova, Case No. 24-CV-1718 (KMM/DJF) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Thomas Hollenhorst, Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Dulce J. Foster, dated June 27, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: August 20, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑