Kalichenko v. Sepal
Kalichenko v. Sepal
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Olena Kalichenko, Case No. 24-CV-02426 (JMB/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Warden Michael Sepal, FCI Waseca; Captain Koch, FCI Waseca; and Unit Manager Kopischke, FCI Waseca, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty dated July 31, 2024. (Doc. No. 11.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Kalichenko’s failure to prosecute it. (See id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 11) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 30, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Olena Kalichenko, Case No. 24-CV-02426 (JMB/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Warden Michael Sepal, FCI Waseca; Captain Koch, FCI Waseca; and Unit Manager Kopischke, FCI Waseca, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty dated July 31, 2024. (Doc. No. 11.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Kalichenko’s failure to prosecute it. (See id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 11) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 30, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.