Chara v. O'Malley
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Chara v. O'Malley
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Christian Paul C., File No. 24-cv-772 (ECT/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on
September 30, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation,
and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon,
73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of
the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED.
2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse or remand the Commissioner’s decision
[ECF No. 9] is DENIED.
3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 13] is
GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 16, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Christian Paul C., File No. 24-cv-772 (ECT/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on
September 30, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation,
and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon,
73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of
the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED.
2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse or remand the Commissioner’s decision
[ECF No. 9] is DENIED.
3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 13] is
GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 16, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown