Holmes v. County of Ramsey
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Holmes v. County of Ramsey
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Stephan Nicholas Holmes, Civ. No. 24-2879 (JWB/DJF)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ACCEPTING
County of Ramsey; Ramsey County REPORT AND
Correctional Health; Ramsey County RECOMMENDATION OF
Sheriff’s; Kristen, Ramsey County Health MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Service ADI Supervisor; Rodriguez, Lt.;
Vanvraahen, Dr.; Jane Does 1-4, Ramsey
County Corrections Officers; Jane Does 4-
10, Nurses at the Ramsey County ADI; John
Does 1-14, Ramsey County Sheriff Officers,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) on September 4, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) No objections have been
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir.
1996). Upon review of the R&R, no clear error is found.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and
proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The September 4, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is
ACCEPTED; and
2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: October 23, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell
JERRY W. BLACKWELL
United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Stephan Nicholas Holmes, Civ. No. 24-2879 (JWB/DJF)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ACCEPTING
County of Ramsey; Ramsey County REPORT AND
Correctional Health; Ramsey County RECOMMENDATION OF
Sheriff’s; Kristen, Ramsey County Health MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Service ADI Supervisor; Rodriguez, Lt.;
Vanvraahen, Dr.; Jane Does 1-4, Ramsey
County Corrections Officers; Jane Does 4-
10, Nurses at the Ramsey County ADI; John
Does 1-14, Ramsey County Sheriff Officers,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) on September 4, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) No objections have been
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir.
1996). Upon review of the R&R, no clear error is found.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and
proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The September 4, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is
ACCEPTED; and
2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: October 23, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell
JERRY W. BLACKWELL
United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown