U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Groce v. O'Malley

Groce v. O'Malley
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided September 30, 2024
Groce v. O'Malley

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Gavin G., File No. 24-cv-947 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 4, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 8] is DENIED; and 3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED; and 4. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Gavin G., File No. 24-cv-947 (ECT/DTS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 4, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 8] is DENIED; and 3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED; and 4. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.