Groce v. O'Malley
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Groce v. O'Malley
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Gavin G., File No. 24-cv-947 (ECT/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on
September 4, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error,
and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS
ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 8] is
DENIED; and
3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 12] is
GRANTED; and
4. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Gavin G., File No. 24-cv-947 (ECT/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on
September 4, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error,
and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS
ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED;
2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 8] is
DENIED; and
3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 12] is
GRANTED; and
4. Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown