U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Favors v. Lanin

Favors v. Lanin
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided October 23, 2024
Favors v. Lanin

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Joseph Anthony Favors, Civ. No. 24-2709 (JWB/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING Mike Lanin, Individual and Official REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Capacity as Security Lead CPS of MSOP; OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Jodi Hardstead, Individual and Official Capacity as Commissioner DHS/MSOP; and Nancy Johnston, Individual and Official Capacity as Executive Director of DHS/CPS of MSOP, and Successor in Office, Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on August 27, 2024. (Doc. No. 14.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.

Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 27, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s request for an “immediate [Preemptory] Restraining Order” (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED.

Date: October 23, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Joseph Anthony Favors, Civ. No. 24-2709 (JWB/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING Mike Lanin, Individual and Official REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Capacity as Security Lead CPS of MSOP; OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Jodi Hardstead, Individual and Official Capacity as Commissioner DHS/MSOP; and Nancy Johnston, Individual and Official Capacity as Executive Director of DHS/CPS of MSOP, and Successor in Office, Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on August 27, 2024. (Doc. No. 14.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.

Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 27, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s request for an “immediate [Preemptory] Restraining Order” (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED.

Date: October 23, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.