Harris v. Vang

U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota October 31, 2024

Trial Court Opinion

            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                             
                DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                


Joshua Harris,                       Case No. 24-CV-01791 (JMB/DJF)       

      Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.                                                                        

Toua Vang, Andrew Nelson,                                                 

      Defendants.                                                    


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of 
United States Magistrate Dulce J. Foster dated September 16, 2024.  (Doc. No. 23.)  The 
R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 
41(b).  (See Doc. No. 23.)  Harris did not object to the R&R.  See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1). 
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error.  See 
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon,

73 F.3d 793, 795

 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).  
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:                              
1.   The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and                           

2.   The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.              

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.                                 
Dated: October 31, 2024                 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan              
                                   Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan            
                                   United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                             
                DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                


Joshua Harris,                       Case No. 24-CV-01791 (JMB/DJF)       

      Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.                                                                        

Toua Vang, Andrew Nelson,                                                 

      Defendants.                                                    


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of 
United States Magistrate Dulce J. Foster dated September 16, 2024.  (Doc. No. 23.)  The 
R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 
41(b).  (See Doc. No. 23.)  Harris did not object to the R&R.  See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1). 
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error.  See 
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon,

73 F.3d 793, 795

 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).  
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:                              
1.   The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and                           

2.   The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.              

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.                                 
Dated: October 31, 2024                 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan              
                                   Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan            
                                   United States District Court

Reference

Status: Unknown