U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Hartwick v. Eischens

Hartwick v. Eischens
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided September 30, 2024

Hartwick v. Eischens

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Burt Hartwick, File No. 24-cv-2877 (ECT/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischens, Warden, FPC Duluth, and US Bureau of Prisons, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on August 26, 2024. ECF No. 5. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED; and 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Burt Hartwick, File No. 24-cv-2877 (ECT/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischens, Warden, FPC Duluth, and US Bureau of Prisons, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on August 26, 2024. ECF No. 5. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED; and 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: September 30, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.