Braxton v. Minnesota, State of
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Braxton v. Minnesota, State of
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sonya Braxton, Case No. 24-CV-02455 (JMB/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
State of Minnesota, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated September 30, 2023. (Doc. No. 23.)
The R&R recommends that Braxton’s Injunction Motion be denied to the extent it seeks a
preliminary injunction in this matter. (See Doc. No. 6.) Neither party has objected to the
R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff Sonya Braxton’s Injunction Motion (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Sonya Braxton, Case No. 24-CV-02455 (JMB/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
State of Minnesota, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated September 30, 2023. (Doc. No. 23.)
The R&R recommends that Braxton’s Injunction Motion be denied to the extent it seeks a
preliminary injunction in this matter. (See Doc. No. 6.) Neither party has objected to the
R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff Sonya Braxton’s Injunction Motion (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown