U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Braxton v. Minnesota, State of

Braxton v. Minnesota, State of
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided November 12, 2024
Braxton v. Minnesota, State of

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Sonya Braxton, Case No. 24-CV-02455 (JMB/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER State of Minnesota, et al., Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated September 30, 2023. (Doc. No. 23.)

The R&R recommends that Braxton’s Injunction Motion be denied to the extent it seeks a preliminary injunction in this matter. (See Doc. No. 6.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff Sonya Braxton’s Injunction Motion (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Sonya Braxton, Case No. 24-CV-02455 (JMB/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER State of Minnesota, et al., Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated September 30, 2023. (Doc. No. 23.)

The R&R recommends that Braxton’s Injunction Motion be denied to the extent it seeks a preliminary injunction in this matter. (See Doc. No. 6.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff Sonya Braxton’s Injunction Motion (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.