Dickens v. Allen Parish Jail
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Thomas Dickens, File No. 24-CV-03448 (JMB/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Allen Parish Jail, Defendant.
Thomas Dickens, Oberlin, LA, self represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas M. Micko dated September 27, 2024. (Doc. No. 3.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff Thomas Dickens’s failure to prosecute. (See id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED; and 2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Thomas Dickens, File No. 24-CV-03448 (JMB/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Allen Parish Jail, Defendant.
Thomas Dickens, Oberlin, LA, self represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas M. Micko dated September 27, 2024. (Doc. No. 3.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff Thomas Dickens’s failure to prosecute. (See id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED; and 2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.