Dickens v. Allen Parish Jail
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Dickens v. Allen Parish Jail
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Thomas Dickens, File No. 24-CV-03448 (JMB/DLM)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Allen Parish Jail,
Defendant.
Thomas Dickens, Oberlin, LA, self represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Douglas M. Micko dated September 27, 2024. (Doc. No.
3.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff Thomas Dickens’s failure to prosecute. (See
id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See
D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED; and
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Thomas Dickens, File No. 24-CV-03448 (JMB/DLM)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Allen Parish Jail,
Defendant.
Thomas Dickens, Oberlin, LA, self represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Douglas M. Micko dated September 27, 2024. (Doc. No.
3.) The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff Thomas Dickens’s failure to prosecute. (See
id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See
D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 3) is ADOPTED; and
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 12, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown