Howell v. Regions Hospital
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Howell v. Regions Hospital
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
William Howell, File No. 24-CV-03618 (JMB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Regions Hospital,
Defendant.
William Howell, self-represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated October 9, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.)
The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff William Howell’s failure to prosecute. (See id.)
Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn.
L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the
above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; and
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 22, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
William Howell, File No. 24-CV-03618 (JMB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Regions Hospital,
Defendant.
William Howell, self-represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated October 9, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.)
The R&R recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff William Howell’s failure to prosecute. (See id.)
Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn.
L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the
above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; and
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: November 22, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown