Dualeh v. Mayorkas
Dualeh v. Mayorkas
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ali Ahmed Dualeh and Samiya Hassan Case No. 23-CV-03554 (JMB/DTS) Mohamud,
Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service; and Trina M. Swanson, Director, Saint Paul Field Office, USCIS; Defendants.
Abdulwahid Osman, Abdulwahid Law Firm PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs Ali Ahmed Dualeh and Samiya Hassan Mohamud.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated October 31, 2024. (Doc. No. 6.)
The R&R recommends that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 6) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ali Ahmed Dualeh and Samiya Hassan Case No. 23-CV-03554 (JMB/DTS) Mohamud,
Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service; and Trina M. Swanson, Director, Saint Paul Field Office, USCIS; Defendants.
Abdulwahid Osman, Abdulwahid Law Firm PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs Ali Ahmed Dualeh and Samiya Hassan Mohamud.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated October 31, 2024. (Doc. No. 6.)
The R&R recommends that the action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 6) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.