Abdikarim v. Galewski
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Abdikarim v. Galewski
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Zakariya Abdikarim, Case No. 24-CV-03483 (JMB/LIB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Christina M. Galewski, Assistant States
Attorney; Marie Elberon, Ottertail States
Attorney,
Defendants.
Zakariya Abdikarim, Fargo, ND, self represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated October 17, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) The
R&R recommends that Plaintiff Zakariya Abdikarim’s claims be dismissed under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See id.) Neither party has objected
to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Zakariya Abdikarim, Case No. 24-CV-03483 (JMB/LIB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Christina M. Galewski, Assistant States
Attorney; Marie Elberon, Ottertail States
Attorney,
Defendants.
Zakariya Abdikarim, Fargo, ND, self represented.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated October 17, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) The
R&R recommends that Plaintiff Zakariya Abdikarim’s claims be dismissed under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See id.) Neither party has objected
to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED.
2. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: December 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown