U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Del Real v. Eischen

Del Real v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided December 12, 2024

Del Real v. Eischen

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Miguel Eduardo Del Real, Case No. 24-CV-42 (KMM/LIB) Petitioner, v. ORDER B. Eischen, Respondent.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois, dated July 23, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF 1], is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Date: December 10, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Miguel Eduardo Del Real, Case No. 24-CV-42 (KMM/LIB) Petitioner, v. ORDER B. Eischen, Respondent.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois, dated July 23, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF 1], is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Date: December 10, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.