Del Real v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Del Real v. Eischen
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Miguel Eduardo Del Real,
Case No. 24-CV-42 (KMM/LIB)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER
B. Eischen,
Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois, dated July 23,
2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific
objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County,563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of
the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear
or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF 1], is DENIED
without prejudice as moot.
Date: December 10, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Miguel Eduardo Del Real,
Case No. 24-CV-42 (KMM/LIB)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER
B. Eischen,
Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois, dated July 23,
2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific
objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County,563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of
the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear
or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF 1], is DENIED
without prejudice as moot.
Date: December 10, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown