Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Amuri v. Garland

Amuri v. Garland
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided December 16, 2024

Amuri v. Garland

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jafari Amuri, Case No. 24-CV-1941 (KMM/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER Merrick Garland, Attorney General of United States, et al., Respondents.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate John F. Docherty, dated August 29, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF 1], is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Let judgment be entered.

Date: December 16, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jafari Amuri, Case No. 24-CV-1941 (KMM/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER Merrick Garland, Attorney General of United States, et al., Respondents.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate John F. Docherty, dated August 29, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF 1], is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Let judgment be entered.

Date: December 16, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑