U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Wernersbach v. Colvin

Wernersbach v. Colvin
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided December 18, 2024
Wernersbach v. Colvin

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mark W. W., File No. 23-cv-3263 (ECT/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on December 2, 2024. ECF No. 19. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] is ACCEPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s brief seeking judgment on the administrative record [ECF No. 14] is DENIED.

3. Defendant’s brief seeking judgment on the administrative record [ECF No. 17] is GRANTED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: December 18, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mark W. W., File No. 23-cv-3263 (ECT/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on December 2, 2024. ECF No. 19. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] is ACCEPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s brief seeking judgment on the administrative record [ECF No. 14] is DENIED.

3. Defendant’s brief seeking judgment on the administrative record [ECF No. 17] is GRANTED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: December 18, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.