Snap Fitness, Inc. v. Scenic City Fitness, Inc.
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Snap Fitness, Inc. v. Scenic City Fitness, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES D
ISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Snap Fitness, Inc., Case No. 24-cv-2803 (NEB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v.
Scenic City Fitness, Inc. et al.,
Defendants.
Defendant Scenic City Fitness, Inc., is corporation that has been unrepresented
since August 22, 2024. The law does not allow a corporation to proceed pro se, and an
unrepresented corporation is technically in default for failure to defend. See Ackra Direct
Mktg. Corp. v. Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 857(8th Cir. 1996). The Court warned Scenic City Fitness that it could be found in default if an attorney did not enter an appearance on its behalf. See Dkt. Nos. 36, 50. Despite these warnings and an order to show cause, Scenic City Fitness has neither secured counsel nor justified its failure to do so. Because Scenic City Fitness has failed to defend, the Court may direct the Clerk of Court to enter default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). See Tollefson v. Pladson,508 Fed. Appx. 593, 595
(8th Cir. 2013) (court may direct clerk to
enter default under Rule 55(a)).
For the reasons set forth above, the Court RECOMMENDS that:
1. The Clerk of Court be directed to enter default judgment against Defendant
Scenic City Fitness, Inc; and
2. Plaintiff Snap Fitness, Inc., be allowed to apply for default judgment.
Dated: October 11, 2024 ____s/David T. Schultz_____
DAVID T. SCHULTZ
U.S. Magistrate Judge
NOTICE
Filing Objections: This Report and Recommendation is not an order or judgment of the
District Court and is therefore not appealable directly to the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
Under Local Rule 72.2(b)(1), “a party may file and serve specific written objections to a
magistrate judge’s proposed finding and recommendations within 14 days after being
served a copy” of the Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to those
objections within 14 days after being served a copy of the objections. See Local
Rule 72.2(b)(2). All objections and responses must comply with the word or line limits set
forth in Local Rule 72.2(c). Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES D
ISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Snap Fitness, Inc., Case No. 24-cv-2803 (NEB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v.
Scenic City Fitness, Inc. et al.,
Defendants.
Defendant Scenic City Fitness, Inc., is corporation that has been unrepresented
since August 22, 2024. The law does not allow a corporation to proceed pro se, and an
unrepresented corporation is technically in default for failure to defend. See Ackra Direct
Mktg. Corp. v. Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 857(8th Cir. 1996). The Court warned Scenic City Fitness that it could be found in default if an attorney did not enter an appearance on its behalf. See Dkt. Nos. 36, 50. Despite these warnings and an order to show cause, Scenic City Fitness has neither secured counsel nor justified its failure to do so. Because Scenic City Fitness has failed to defend, the Court may direct the Clerk of Court to enter default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). See Tollefson v. Pladson,508 Fed. Appx. 593, 595
(8th Cir. 2013) (court may direct clerk to
enter default under Rule 55(a)).
For the reasons set forth above, the Court RECOMMENDS that:
1. The Clerk of Court be directed to enter default judgment against Defendant
Scenic City Fitness, Inc; and
2. Plaintiff Snap Fitness, Inc., be allowed to apply for default judgment.
Dated: October 11, 2024 ____s/David T. Schultz_____
DAVID T. SCHULTZ
U.S. Magistrate Judge
NOTICE
Filing Objections: This Report and Recommendation is not an order or judgment of the
District Court and is therefore not appealable directly to the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
Under Local Rule 72.2(b)(1), “a party may file and serve specific written objections to a
magistrate judge’s proposed finding and recommendations within 14 days after being
served a copy” of the Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to those
objections within 14 days after being served a copy of the objections. See Local
Rule 72.2(b)(2). All objections and responses must comply with the word or line limits set
forth in Local Rule 72.2(c). Reference
- Status
- Unknown