U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Steiner v. Ashworth

Steiner v. Ashworth
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided January 8, 2024

Steiner v. Ashworth

Trial Court Opinion

Valerie Steiner, Civ. No. 23-3719 (JWB/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Brian Ashworth, Defendant.

United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on December 7, 2023. (Doc. No. 3.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.

Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The December 7, 2023 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is ACCEPTED.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: January 8, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL

Trial Court Opinion

Valerie Steiner, Civ. No. 23-3719 (JWB/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Brian Ashworth, Defendant.

United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on December 7, 2023. (Doc. No. 3.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.

Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The December 7, 2023 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is ACCEPTED.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: January 8, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.