Lidel v. Bosch
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Lidel v. Bosch
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ricky Lee Lidel,
Case No. 22-CV-2918 (KMM/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Paul Schnell, et al.
Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated
August 28, 2023. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period
permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific
objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County,563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of
the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear
or otherwise, and the R&R is adopted in full.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 39-1) is DISMISSED without
prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to submit service forms for any defendant in this
case, in compliance with the Court’s Order of May 12, 2023 (ECF 43).
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: February 2, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Ricky Lee Lidel,
Case No. 22-CV-2918 (KMM/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Paul Schnell, et al.
Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated
August 28, 2023. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period
permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific
objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County,563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of
the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear
or otherwise, and the R&R is adopted in full.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 39-1) is DISMISSED without
prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to submit service forms for any defendant in this
case, in compliance with the Court’s Order of May 12, 2023 (ECF 43).
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: February 2, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown