Young v. Eischen
Young v. Eischen
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA HOWARD YOUNG, Case No. 23-CV-3227 (PJS/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WARDEN B. EISCHEN, Respondent.
Petitioner Howard Young, pro se.
Kristen Elise Rau and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney’s Office, for respondent B. Eischen *** The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. [ECF No. 9.] No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Howard Young [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: February 5, 2024 s/Patrick J. Schiltz PATRICK J. SCHILTZ Chief United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA HOWARD YOUNG, Case No. 23-CV-3227 (PJS/JFD) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WARDEN B. EISCHEN, Respondent.
Petitioner Howard Young, pro se.
Kristen Elise Rau and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney’s Office, for respondent B. Eischen *** The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. [ECF No. 9.] No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Howard Young [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: February 5, 2024 s/Patrick J. Schiltz PATRICK J. SCHILTZ Chief United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.