Young v. Eischen
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Young v. Eischen
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
HOWARD YOUNG, Case No. 23-CV-3227 (PJS/JFD)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
WARDEN B. EISCHEN,
Respondent.
Petitioner Howard Young, pro se.
Kristen Elise Rau and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney’s Office, for respondent
B. Eischen
***
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. [ECF No. 9.] No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear
error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Howard Young [ECF
No. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
jurisdiction.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: February 5, 2024 s/Patrick J. Schiltz
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ
Chief United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
HOWARD YOUNG, Case No. 23-CV-3227 (PJS/JFD)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
WARDEN B. EISCHEN,
Respondent.
Petitioner Howard Young, pro se.
Kristen Elise Rau and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney’s Office, for respondent
B. Eischen
***
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. [ECF No. 9.] No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear
error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Howard Young [ECF
No. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
jurisdiction.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: February 5, 2024 s/Patrick J. Schiltz
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ
Chief United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown