McIntosh v. Williams
McIntosh v. Williams
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick Randell McIntosh, Case No. 23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB) Petitioner,
ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Eric Williams, Respondent.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Doc. No. 10.) No party objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is ADOPTED; and 2. Petitioner Patrick Randell McIntosh’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED; 3. Petitioner’s two Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, (Doc. Nos. 4, 8), are DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick Randell McIntosh, Case No. 23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB) Petitioner,
ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Eric Williams, Respondent.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Doc. No. 10.) No party objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is ADOPTED; and 2. Petitioner Patrick Randell McIntosh’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED; 3. Petitioner’s two Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, (Doc. Nos. 4, 8), are DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.