McIntosh v. Williams
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
McIntosh v. Williams
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick Randell McIntosh, Case No. 23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB)
Petitioner,
ORDER ON REPORT AND
v.
RECOMMENDATION
Eric Williams,
Respondent.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Doc. No. 10.) No party objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no
clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned
matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is ADOPTED; and
2. Petitioner Patrick Randell McIntosh’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED;
3. Petitioner’s two Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying
Fees or Costs, (Doc. Nos. 4, 8), are DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Patrick Randell McIntosh, Case No. 23-cv-2696 (JMB/LIB)
Petitioner,
ORDER ON REPORT AND
v.
RECOMMENDATION
Eric Williams,
Respondent.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Doc. No. 10.) No party objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no
clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned
matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is ADOPTED; and
2. Petitioner Patrick Randell McIntosh’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED;
3. Petitioner’s two Applications to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying
Fees or Costs, (Doc. Nos. 4, 8), are DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 2, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown