Sichting v. Rarden
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Sichting v. Rarden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Shane Sichting, Civ. No. 23-783 (JWB/LIB)
Petitioner,
v.
Jared Rarden, Warden, Rochester
FMC/FBOP,
Respondent.
Shane Sichting, Civ. No. 23-784 (JWB/LIB)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Jared Rarden, Warden, Rochester OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FMC/FBOP,
Respondent.
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) on January 18, 2024. (Doc. No. 24.) No objections have been
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir.
1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and
proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The January 18, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 24) is
ACCEPTED;
2. Petitioner Shane Sichting’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) in Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-783 (JWB/LIB), is
DENIED;
3. The action captioned Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-783 (JWB/LIB), is
DISMISSED with prejudice;
4. Petitioner Shane Sichting’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) in Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-784 (JWB/LIB), is
DENIED; and
5. The action captioned Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-784 (JWB/LIB), is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: February 13, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell
JERRY W. BLACKWELL
United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Shane Sichting, Civ. No. 23-783 (JWB/LIB)
Petitioner,
v.
Jared Rarden, Warden, Rochester
FMC/FBOP,
Respondent.
Shane Sichting, Civ. No. 23-784 (JWB/LIB)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Jared Rarden, Warden, Rochester OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FMC/FBOP,
Respondent.
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) on January 18, 2024. (Doc. No. 24.) No objections have been
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir.
1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and
proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The January 18, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 24) is
ACCEPTED;
2. Petitioner Shane Sichting’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) in Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-783 (JWB/LIB), is
DENIED;
3. The action captioned Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-783 (JWB/LIB), is
DISMISSED with prejudice;
4. Petitioner Shane Sichting’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) in Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-784 (JWB/LIB), is
DENIED; and
5. The action captioned Sichting v. Rarden, Civ. No. 23-784 (JWB/LIB), is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: February 13, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell
JERRY W. BLACKWELL
United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown