U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Bodeau v. O'Malley

Bodeau v. O'Malley
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided February 15, 2024

Bodeau v. O'Malley

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Robert B., File No. 22-cv-2093 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Martin J. O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on January 31, 2024. ECF No. 28. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 28] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff Robert B.’s request for reversal or remand of the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 20] is DENIED; and 3. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: February 15, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Robert B., File No. 22-cv-2093 (ECT/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Martin J. O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on January 31, 2024. ECF No. 28. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 28] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff Robert B.’s request for reversal or remand of the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 20] is DENIED; and 3. Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: February 15, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.