Friday v. Peters

U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota

Friday v. Peters

Trial Court Opinion

                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                            
                    DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                

 Cleone Cecelia Friday,                                                  
                                    Case No. 23-cv-2870 (KMM/DTS)        


               Plaintiff,                                                



 v.                                                                      

ORDER

 Colette Peters, et al.,                                                 

               Defendants.                                               


    This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 
of Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated November 30, 2023.  [R&R, ECF No. 7].  In 
the R&R, Judge Schultz recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice 
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.  Cleone Cecelia 
Friday, a federal inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Waseca, Minnesota 
(“FCI-Waseca”), failed to submit an initial partial filing fee of $64.70 that was required to 
continue the matter.  [Order, ECF No. 6].  To date, no objections have been made to the 
R&R by Ms. Friday, and the deadline for filing such objections has long since passed.  
Indeed, Ms. Friday has not submitted anything since early October, when she submitted 
some documents in support of her original Complaint.  [ECF No. 5].        
    The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are 
made.  
28 U.S.C. § 636
(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b).  In the absence of objections, the Court 
reviews the R&R for clear error.  Nur v. Olmsted County, 
563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949  
(D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and Grinder v. Gammon, 
73 F.3d 793, 795
 
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)).  Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the 
record in this case, this Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.  The Magistrate Judge 

committed no error, clear or otherwise.                                   
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:                                           
    1.  Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz’s November 30, 2023, Report and 
      Recommendation [ECF. No. 7] is ADOPTED;                            
    2.  Plaintiff Cleone Cecelia Friday’s action is DISMISSED WITHOUT    
      PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to 

      prosecute; and                                                     
    3.   Plaintiff Cleone Cecelia Friday’s Application to Proceed in District Court 
      Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, [ECF No. 2], be DENIED as moot.   
    Let Judgment be entered accordingly.                                 



Date: March 11, 2024            s/Katherine Menendez                     
                                Katherine Menendez                       
                                United States District Court             





                               2                                         

Trial Court Opinion

                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                            
                    DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                

 Cleone Cecelia Friday,                                                  
                                    Case No. 23-cv-2870 (KMM/DTS)        


               Plaintiff,                                                



 v.                                                                      

ORDER

 Colette Peters, et al.,                                                 

               Defendants.                                               


    This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 
of Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated November 30, 2023.  [R&R, ECF No. 7].  In 
the R&R, Judge Schultz recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice 
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.  Cleone Cecelia 
Friday, a federal inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Waseca, Minnesota 
(“FCI-Waseca”), failed to submit an initial partial filing fee of $64.70 that was required to 
continue the matter.  [Order, ECF No. 6].  To date, no objections have been made to the 
R&R by Ms. Friday, and the deadline for filing such objections has long since passed.  
Indeed, Ms. Friday has not submitted anything since early October, when she submitted 
some documents in support of her original Complaint.  [ECF No. 5].        
    The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are 
made.  
28 U.S.C. § 636
(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b).  In the absence of objections, the Court 
reviews the R&R for clear error.  Nur v. Olmsted County, 
563 F. Supp. 3d 946
, 949  
(D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and Grinder v. Gammon, 
73 F.3d 793, 795
 
(8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)).  Based on the Court’s careful review of the R&R and the 
record in this case, this Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.  The Magistrate Judge 

committed no error, clear or otherwise.                                   
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:                                           
    1.  Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz’s November 30, 2023, Report and 
      Recommendation [ECF. No. 7] is ADOPTED;                            
    2.  Plaintiff Cleone Cecelia Friday’s action is DISMISSED WITHOUT    
      PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to 

      prosecute; and                                                     
    3.   Plaintiff Cleone Cecelia Friday’s Application to Proceed in District Court 
      Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, [ECF No. 2], be DENIED as moot.   
    Let Judgment be entered accordingly.                                 



Date: March 11, 2024            s/Katherine Menendez                     
                                Katherine Menendez                       
                                United States District Court             





                               2                                         

Reference

Status
Unknown