Konz v. Witt
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Konz v. Witt
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Deanna Sue Konz, File No. 23-cv-679 (ECT/DTS)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Dawanna S. Witt, Hennepin County Sheriff;
Michael K. Browne, Presiding Judge;
Andrea Lyn Martin, District Attorney; Daniel
Moreno, Judge; Elizabeth Scoggin, District
Attorney; Amanda Stokes, Public Defender;
and Daniel Morano, Judge,
Respondents.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on
February 28, 2024. ECF No. 23. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation,
and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon,
73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of
the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 23] is ACCEPTED;
2. Petitioner Deanna Sue Konz’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and
3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 27, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Deanna Sue Konz, File No. 23-cv-679 (ECT/DTS)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Dawanna S. Witt, Hennepin County Sheriff;
Michael K. Browne, Presiding Judge;
Andrea Lyn Martin, District Attorney; Daniel
Moreno, Judge; Elizabeth Scoggin, District
Attorney; Amanda Stokes, Public Defender;
and Daniel Morano, Judge,
Respondents.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on
February 28, 2024. ECF No. 23. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation,
and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon,
73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of
the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 23] is ACCEPTED;
2. Petitioner Deanna Sue Konz’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and
3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 27, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown