Wilson v. State of Minnesota
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Wilson v. State of Minnesota
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Edward Wilson, File No. 23-cv-3673 (ECT/DLM)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
State of Minnesota and Ramsey County
Detention Center, All staff,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on
February 22, 2024. ECF No. 10. No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error,
and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT
IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 10] is ACCEPTED.
2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), this action is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
3. Plaintiff Edward Wilson’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF
No. 3] is DENIED AS MOOT.
4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Access Grievances History [ECF No. 9] is DENIED AS
MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 25, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Edward Wilson, File No. 23-cv-3673 (ECT/DLM)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
State of Minnesota and Ramsey County
Detention Center, All staff,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on
February 22, 2024. ECF No. 10. No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error,
and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT
IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 10] is ACCEPTED.
2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), this action is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
3. Plaintiff Edward Wilson’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF
No. 3] is DENIED AS MOOT.
4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Access Grievances History [ECF No. 9] is DENIED AS
MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 25, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown