Moore v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Moore v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Anthony Moore, Civ. No. 24-436 (JWB/JFD)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
ACCEPTING REPORT AND
Minnesota Department of Corrections, RECOMMENDATION OF
Employees and Officials - sued in their MAGISTRATE JUDGE
individual and official capacities, and The
Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions, in Saint
Paul Minnesota - Directors Employees and
Officials sued in their individual and official
capacities,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) on March 28, 2024. (Doc. No. 7.) No objections have been
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir.
1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and
proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The March 28, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is
ACCEPTED; and
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 19, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell
JERRY W. BLACKWELL
United States District Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Anthony Moore, Civ. No. 24-436 (JWB/JFD)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
ACCEPTING REPORT AND
Minnesota Department of Corrections, RECOMMENDATION OF
Employees and Officials - sued in their MAGISTRATE JUDGE
individual and official capacities, and The
Bureau of Criminal Apprehensions, in Saint
Paul Minnesota - Directors Employees and
Officials sued in their individual and official
capacities,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) on March 28, 2024. (Doc. No. 7.) No objections have been
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir.
1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.
Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and
proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The March 28, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is
ACCEPTED; and
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 19, 2024 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell
JERRY W. BLACKWELL
United States District Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown