Myers v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Myers v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jennifer Myers, Civ. No. 23-2528 (PAM/ECW)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
United HealthCare Services, Inc.,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of
United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated March 25, 2024. (Docket
No. 4). The R&R recommends dismissing this matter without prejudice for failure to
prosecute. The Court has received no objections to the R&R and the time to do so has
expired. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1) (providing that a party may file objections to a
magistrate judge’s recommendations within 14 days).
This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections
are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for
clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the
Magistrate Judge’s reasoning.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The R&R (Docket No. 4) is ADOPTED; and
2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 22, 2024
s/Paul A. Magnuson
Paul A. Magnuson
United States District Court Judge Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jennifer Myers, Civ. No. 23-2528 (PAM/ECW)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
United HealthCare Services, Inc.,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of
United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated March 25, 2024. (Docket
No. 4). The R&R recommends dismissing this matter without prejudice for failure to
prosecute. The Court has received no objections to the R&R and the time to do so has
expired. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1) (providing that a party may file objections to a
magistrate judge’s recommendations within 14 days).
This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections
are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon,73 F.3d 793, 795
(8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for
clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the
Magistrate Judge’s reasoning.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The R&R (Docket No. 4) is ADOPTED; and
2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Date: April 22, 2024
s/Paul A. Magnuson
Paul A. Magnuson
United States District Court Judge Reference
- Status
- Unknown