Braun v. Maslankowski
Braun v. Maslankowski
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nathan Christopher Braun, Case No. 23-CV-1784 (JMB/DLM) Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Jail administrator-Captain Mark Maslankowski, Lt. Kellen Boerger, Lt.
Sean Haney, Sgt. Dave Wenderski, Sgt.
Hoxter, Sgt. Polak, Sgt. Brixius, Sgt.
Megan Lahr, Shift Supervisor #2712, Shift Supervisor #2711, Sgt. #2705, Unnamed and Unnumbered Shift Supervisor, Shift Supervisor #2709, Ofc.
Knick, Ofc. Long, Ofc. Stossel, SORT for the Date of 7/12/2023, Ofc. Crawford, Ofc. Huisman, Ofc. Vanravensway, Ofc.
Budgett, Ofc. Karnes, Ofc. Watry, SORT for the Date of 5/1/2023, Ofc. Stephany, Ofc. Giese, Ofc. Bienusa, Ofc. Kruger, Ofc. C. Brown, Unknown Ofc. Standing Outside of Cell at 0500 on the Date of 7/13/2023, and Ofc. Hogie, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated February 22, 2024. (Doc. No. 25.)
The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Nathan Christopher Braun’s Second Amendment Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 17) be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See Doc. No. 25.) Braun did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED; 2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 9, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nathan Christopher Braun, Case No. 23-CV-1784 (JMB/DLM) Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Jail administrator-Captain Mark Maslankowski, Lt. Kellen Boerger, Lt.
Sean Haney, Sgt. Dave Wenderski, Sgt.
Hoxter, Sgt. Polak, Sgt. Brixius, Sgt.
Megan Lahr, Shift Supervisor #2712, Shift Supervisor #2711, Sgt. #2705, Unnamed and Unnumbered Shift Supervisor, Shift Supervisor #2709, Ofc.
Knick, Ofc. Long, Ofc. Stossel, SORT for the Date of 7/12/2023, Ofc. Crawford, Ofc. Huisman, Ofc. Vanravensway, Ofc.
Budgett, Ofc. Karnes, Ofc. Watry, SORT for the Date of 5/1/2023, Ofc. Stephany, Ofc. Giese, Ofc. Bienusa, Ofc. Kruger, Ofc. C. Brown, Unknown Ofc. Standing Outside of Cell at 0500 on the Date of 7/13/2023, and Ofc. Hogie, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated February 22, 2024. (Doc. No. 25.)
The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Nathan Christopher Braun’s Second Amendment Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 17) be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See Doc. No. 25.) Braun did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED; 2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 9, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.