Braun v. Maslankowski
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
Braun v. Maslankowski
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nathan Christopher Braun, Case No. 23-CV-1784 (JMB/DLM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT AND
v.
RECOMMENDATION
Jail administrator-Captain Mark
Maslankowski, Lt. Kellen Boerger, Lt.
Sean Haney, Sgt. Dave Wenderski, Sgt.
Hoxter, Sgt. Polak, Sgt. Brixius, Sgt.
Megan Lahr, Shift Supervisor #2712,
Shift Supervisor #2711, Sgt. #2705,
Unnamed and Unnumbered Shift
Supervisor, Shift Supervisor #2709, Ofc.
Knick, Ofc. Long, Ofc. Stossel, SORT for
the Date of 7/12/2023, Ofc. Crawford,
Ofc. Huisman, Ofc. Vanravensway, Ofc.
Budgett, Ofc. Karnes, Ofc. Watry, SORT
for the Date of 5/1/2023, Ofc. Stephany,
Ofc. Giese, Ofc. Bienusa, Ofc. Kruger,
Ofc. C. Brown, Unknown Ofc. Standing
Outside of Cell at 0500 on the Date of
7/13/2023, and Ofc. Hogie,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated February 22, 2024. (Doc. No. 25.)
The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Nathan Christopher Braun’s Second Amendment
Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 17) be dismissed without prejudice under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See Doc. No. 25.) Braun
did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn.
L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED;
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 9, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nathan Christopher Braun, Case No. 23-CV-1784 (JMB/DLM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT AND
v.
RECOMMENDATION
Jail administrator-Captain Mark
Maslankowski, Lt. Kellen Boerger, Lt.
Sean Haney, Sgt. Dave Wenderski, Sgt.
Hoxter, Sgt. Polak, Sgt. Brixius, Sgt.
Megan Lahr, Shift Supervisor #2712,
Shift Supervisor #2711, Sgt. #2705,
Unnamed and Unnumbered Shift
Supervisor, Shift Supervisor #2709, Ofc.
Knick, Ofc. Long, Ofc. Stossel, SORT for
the Date of 7/12/2023, Ofc. Crawford,
Ofc. Huisman, Ofc. Vanravensway, Ofc.
Budgett, Ofc. Karnes, Ofc. Watry, SORT
for the Date of 5/1/2023, Ofc. Stephany,
Ofc. Giese, Ofc. Bienusa, Ofc. Kruger,
Ofc. C. Brown, Unknown Ofc. Standing
Outside of Cell at 0500 on the Date of
7/13/2023, and Ofc. Hogie,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of
United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko dated February 22, 2024. (Doc. No. 25.)
The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Nathan Christopher Braun’s Second Amendment
Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 17) be dismissed without prejudice under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (See Doc. No. 25.) Braun
did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn.
L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-
captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The R&R (Doc. No. 25) is ADOPTED;
2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 9, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
United States District Court Reference
- Status
- Unknown