Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Pantoe v. Caine & Weiner Co., Inc

Pantoe v. Caine & Weiner Co., Inc
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided May 13, 2024

Pantoe v. Caine & Weiner Co., Inc

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mario Pantoe, Case No. 23-CV-2959 (KMM/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Caine & Weiner Co., Inc., Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko, dated March 29, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: May 13, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mario Pantoe, Case No. 23-CV-2959 (KMM/DLM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Caine & Weiner Co., Inc., Defendant.

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko, dated March 29, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.

Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.

Date: May 13, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑