Frank v. State of Minnesota
Frank v. State of Minnesota
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joshua David Frank, Case No. 23-CV-3768 (KMM/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER State of Minnesota; Dilworth Police Department; Schlee, Officer – Dilworth Police Dept. Badge 745, sued in his or her official and individual capacity; White Earth Tribal Police Dept.; and Franklin Tibbets, Officer – Tribal Police 823 – sued in his or her official and individual capacity, Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated February 14, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis, [ECF 2, 6], is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiff’s motion to add supplement, [ECF 8], is DENIED as moot Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: May 13, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joshua David Frank, Case No. 23-CV-3768 (KMM/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER State of Minnesota; Dilworth Police Department; Schlee, Officer – Dilworth Police Dept. Badge 745, sued in his or her official and individual capacity; White Earth Tribal Police Dept.; and Franklin Tibbets, Officer – Tribal Police 823 – sued in his or her official and individual capacity, Defendants.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, dated February 14, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis, [ECF 2, 6], is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiff’s motion to add supplement, [ECF 8], is DENIED as moot Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: May 13, 2024 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.