McGowan v. O'Malley
McGowan v. O'Malley
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Tristan M., Case No. 23-CV-2077 (JMB/DTS) Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Martin J. O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated April 16, 2024. (Doc. No. 28.) The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Tristan M.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) be denied, and that Defendant Martin J. O’Malley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) be granted. (See Doc. No. 28.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 28) is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 16, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Tristan M., Case No. 23-CV-2077 (JMB/DTS) Plaintiff,
ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Martin J. O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated April 16, 2024. (Doc. No. 28.) The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Tristan M.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) be denied, and that Defendant Martin J. O’Malley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) be granted. (See Doc. No. 28.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 28) is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 16, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.