U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2024

Marin-Angel v. Segal

Marin-Angel v. Segal
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided May 24, 2024

Marin-Angel v. Segal

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Juana Marin-Angel, Case No. 23-CV-3209 (JMB/LIB) Petitioner,

ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION

Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated April 23, 2024. (Doc. No. 14.) The R&R recommends that Petitioner Juana Marin-Angel’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) be denied as moot. (See Doc. No. 14.) Marin-Angel did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 14) is ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner Juana Marin-Angel’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: May 24, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Juana Marin-Angel, Case No. 23-CV-3209 (JMB/LIB) Petitioner,

ORDER ON REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION

Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated April 23, 2024. (Doc. No. 14.) The R&R recommends that Petitioner Juana Marin-Angel’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) be denied as moot. (See Doc. No. 14.) Marin-Angel did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 14) is ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner Juana Marin-Angel’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: May 24, 2024 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.