Gallop v. Segal

U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota

Gallop v. Segal

Trial Court Opinion

               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                             
                   DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                


Teresa Gallop,                                            Civ. No. 24-1357 (JWB/DTS) 

         Petitioner,                                                    

v.                                 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND             
                                     RECOMMENDATION OF                  
Michael Segal, Warden,                  MAGISTRATE JUDGE                  

        Respondent.                                                     

   United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and  
Recommendation (“R&R”) on May 14, 2024. (Doc. No. 5.) No objections have been 
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed 
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 
73 F.3d 793, 795
 (8th Cir. 
1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.                  
   Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and 
proceedings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:                                   
   1.   The May 14, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) is      
ACCEPTED; and                                                             
   2.   Petitioner Teresa Gallop’s Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.     
   LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.                                 

Date: June 11, 2024              s/ Jerry W. Blackwell                  
                                 JERRY W. BLACKWELL                     
                                 United States District Judge           

Trial Court Opinion

               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                             
                   DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                


Teresa Gallop,                                            Civ. No. 24-1357 (JWB/DTS) 

         Petitioner,                                                    

v.                                 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND             
                                     RECOMMENDATION OF                  
Michael Segal, Warden,                  MAGISTRATE JUDGE                  

        Respondent.                                                     

   United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and  
Recommendation (“R&R”) on May 14, 2024. (Doc. No. 5.) No objections have been 
filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed 
for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 
73 F.3d 793, 795
 (8th Cir. 
1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found.                  
   Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and 
proceedings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:                                   
   1.   The May 14, 2024 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) is      
ACCEPTED; and                                                             
   2.   Petitioner Teresa Gallop’s Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.     
   LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.                                 

Date: June 11, 2024              s/ Jerry W. Blackwell                  
                                 JERRY W. BLACKWELL                     
                                 United States District Judge           

Reference

Status
Unknown