Bell v. Segal

U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota

Bell v. Segal

Trial Court Opinion

                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                            
                   DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                

APRIL N. BELL,                     Case No. 23-CV-2237 (PJS/JFD)        

              Petitioner,                                               

v.                               ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND              
                                      RECOMMENDATION                    
MICHAEL SEGAL,                                                          

              Respondent.                                               


   The  Court  has  received  the  Report  and  Recommendation  of  United  States 
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. No. 18.) No party has objected to that Report 
and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. 
P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 
73 F.3d 793, 795
 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no 
clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned 
matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:                                        
     1.  .The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 18) is ADOPTED;       
     2.  Petitioner April N. Bell’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under Section 
        2241, (Dkt. No. 1), is DENIED;                                  
     3.  This matter is DISMISSED.                                      
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.                                      
Dated: June 21, 2024            s/Patrick J. Schiltz                    
                                Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge         

                                United States District Court            

Trial Court Opinion

                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                            
                   DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA                                

APRIL N. BELL,                     Case No. 23-CV-2237 (PJS/JFD)        

              Petitioner,                                               

v.                               ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND              
                                      RECOMMENDATION                    
MICHAEL SEGAL,                                                          

              Respondent.                                               


   The  Court  has  received  the  Report  and  Recommendation  of  United  States 
Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Dkt. No. 18.) No party has objected to that Report 
and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. 
P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 
73 F.3d 793, 795
 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no 
clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned 
matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:                                        
     1.  .The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 18) is ADOPTED;       
     2.  Petitioner April N. Bell’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under Section 
        2241, (Dkt. No. 1), is DENIED;                                  
     3.  This matter is DISMISSED.                                      
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.                                      
Dated: June 21, 2024            s/Patrick J. Schiltz                    
                                Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge         

                                United States District Court            

Reference

Status
Unknown