U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Martinez v. Segal

Martinez v. Segal
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided January 8, 2025

Martinez v. Segal

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jenna L. Martinez, Case No. 24-CV-04049 (JMB/LIB) Petitioner, v. ORDER Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois dated November 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed.

See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; and 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: January 8, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Jenna L. Martinez, Case No. 24-CV-04049 (JMB/LIB) Petitioner, v. ORDER Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois dated November 25, 2024. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed.

See D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).

Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; and 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: January 8, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.