Becerra v. United States
Becerra v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Erik Becerra, Case No. 24-CV-04309 (JMB/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER United States of America, Warden’s, Captain, Inmate Atnip, Lt, Psychologist, and Prison of Rochester, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Tony N. Leung dated January 2, 2025. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D.
Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1). In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; and 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 3, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Erik Becerra, Case No. 24-CV-04309 (JMB/TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER United States of America, Warden’s, Captain, Inmate Atnip, Lt, Psychologist, and Prison of Rochester, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Tony N. Leung dated January 2, 2025. (Doc. No. 4.) The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Id.) Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. See D.
Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1). In the absence of timely objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED; and 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 3, 2025 /s/ Jeffrey M. Bryan Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.