Critt v. Warden, MCF - Rush City
Critt v. Warden, MCF - Rush City
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
JUSTIN MARSHALL CRITT, Case No. 24-cv-3828 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WARDEN, MCF – RUSH CITY, Respondent.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 13, of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Justin Marshall Critt’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, as untimely. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED; 2. Mr. Critt’s petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED as untimely; and 3. No certificate of appealability is issued.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 3, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
JUSTIN MARSHALL CRITT, Case No. 24-cv-3828 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WARDEN, MCF – RUSH CITY, Respondent.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 13, of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Justin Marshall Critt’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, as untimely. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED; 2. Mr. Critt’s petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED as untimely; and 3. No certificate of appealability is issued.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: March 3, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.