U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, 2025

Contreras v. Vaught

Contreras v. Vaught
U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · Decided March 26, 2025

Contreras v. Vaught

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mario Contreras, File No. 25-cv-456 (ECT/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION T. Vaught, Warden, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on February 25, 2025. ECF No. 7. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 7] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: March 26, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Mario Contreras, File No. 25-cv-456 (ECT/DLM) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION T. Vaught, Warden, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on February 25, 2025. ECF No. 7. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 7] is ACCEPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [ECF No. 1] is DENIED; and 3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: March 26, 2025 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.