Church v. Schnell
Church v. Schnell
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
JUSTIN DALE CHURCH, Case No. 24-cv-2291 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. PAUL SCHNELL, KATHRYN ORDER ADOPTING HALVERSON,1 JAMISON DOEDEN, REPORT AND CHRIS PAWELK, LISA CONNORS, RECOMMENDATION KELLY MCELROY, AMANDA HOFER, CHAD MERCURE, ADAM PERRY, BRONSON AUSTRENG, and JEFF WHITE, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, entered February 25, 2025. ECF No. 32.
The R&R recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) be granted, and that Plaintiff Justin Dale Church’s complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing. ECF No. 32 at 13. None of the parties has objected to the R&R, so the Court reviews it for clear error. Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Separately, Church filed a motion requesting oral argument on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 25.
1 The correct spelling is Kathryn Halvorson.
Having carefully reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. And in light of the R&R, Church’s request for oral argument regarding Defendants’ motion to dismiss is moot.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 32) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED; 3. Church’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing; and 4. Church’s Motion for Oral Argument (ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 7, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
JUSTIN DALE CHURCH, Case No. 24-cv-2291 (LMP/LIB) Plaintiff, v. PAUL SCHNELL, KATHRYN ORDER ADOPTING HALVERSON,1 JAMISON DOEDEN, REPORT AND CHRIS PAWELK, LISA CONNORS, RECOMMENDATION KELLY MCELROY, AMANDA HOFER, CHAD MERCURE, ADAM PERRY, BRONSON AUSTRENG, and JEFF WHITE, Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, entered February 25, 2025. ECF No. 32.
The R&R recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) be granted, and that Plaintiff Justin Dale Church’s complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing. ECF No. 32 at 13. None of the parties has objected to the R&R, so the Court reviews it for clear error. Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Separately, Church filed a motion requesting oral argument on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 25.
1 The correct spelling is Kathryn Halvorson.
Having carefully reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. And in light of the R&R, Church’s request for oral argument regarding Defendants’ motion to dismiss is moot.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 32) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED; 3. Church’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing; and 4. Church’s Motion for Oral Argument (ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 7, 2025 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.